Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Early endovenous ablation of superficial venous reflux as an adjuvant to compression therapy reduced the time to healing of venous leg ulcers and has a cost per QALY of about £3976.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Manjit S Gohel, Francine Heatley, Xinxue Liu, Andrew Bradbury, Richard Bulbulia, Nicky Cullum, David M Epstein, Isaac Nyamekye, Keith R Poskitt, Sophie Renton, Jane Warwick & Alun H Davies.

Manjit S Gohel 1,2, Francine Heatley 2, Xinxue Liu 3, Andrew Bradbury 4, Richard Bulbulia 5,6,7, Nicky Cullum 8, David M Epstein 9, Isaac Nyamekye 10, Keith R Poskitt 5, Sophie Renton 11, Jane Warwick 3,12, Alun H Davies 2,*

1 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
3 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
5 Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
6 Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
8 School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
10 Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
11 North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
12 Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
* Corresponding author Email: a.h.davies@imperial.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions