Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study developed an intervention package that was acceptable to patients and staff, but it encountered challenges so it was unable to conclude whether a full trial would be feasible.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Carina King 1, Carrie Llewellyn 2,, Maryam Shahmanesh 1,, Charles Abraham 3, Julia Bailey 4, Fiona Burns 1, Laura Clark 5, Andrew Copas 1,6, Alison Howarth 1, Gwenda Hughes 7, Cath Mercer 1, Alec Miners 8, Alex Pollard 2, Daniel Richardson 5, Alison Rodger 1, Anupama Roy 2, Richard Gilson 1,*

1 Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
3 Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
4 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
5 Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
6 London Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
7 Sexually Transmitted Infection Surveillance, Public Health England, London, UK
8 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: r.gilson@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document