Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage dementia led to large positive effects for participant-rated goal attainment at 3 months and 9 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Linda Clare 1,*, Aleksandra Kudlicka 1, Jan R Oyebode 2, Roy W Jones 3, Antony Bayer 4, Iracema Leroi 5, Michael Kopelman 6, Ian A James 7, Alison Culverwell 8, Jackie Pool 9, Andrew Brand 10, Catherine Henderson 11, Zoe Hoare 10, Martin Knapp 11, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer 12, Alistair Burns 5, Anne Corbett 1, Rhiannon Whitaker 13, Bob Woods 14

1 Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2 School of Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
3 Research Institute for the Care of Older People (RICE), Bath, UK
4 Division of Population Medicine, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
5 Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Centre of the Health of the Elderly, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
8 Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, St Martin’s Hospital, Canterbury, UK
9 Dementia Pal Ltd, Southampton, UK
10 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
11 Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
12 Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
13 Whitaker Research Ltd, Bangor, UK
14 Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions