Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This 10-year follow-up showed that DRIFT improves cognitive function (when taking into account birth weight, grade of haemorrhage and gender), and that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was about £16,000.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Karen Luyt 1,*, Sally Jary 1, Charlotte Lea 1, Grace J Young 2, David Odd 1,3, Helen Miller 1, Grazyna Kmita 4, Cathy Williams 5, Peter S Blair 2, Aída Moure Fernández 2, William Hollingworth 2, Michelle Morgan 6, Adam Smith-Collins 1, N Jade Thai 7, Steven Walker-Cox 1, Kristian Aquilina 8, Ian Pople 9, Andrew Whitelaw 1

1 Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2 Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3 Neonatal Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
4 Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
5 Paediatric Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
6 Department of Psychology, Community Children’s Health Partnership, Bristol, UK
7 Clinical Research and Imaging Centre, Bristol, UK
8 Paediatric Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
9 Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Karen.Luyt@bristol.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document