Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Progesterone had no significant beneficial or harmful effects on the primary obstetric, neonatal or childhood outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jane E Norman 1,*, Neil Marlow 2, Claudia-Martina Messow 3, Andrew Shennan 4, Philip R Bennett 5, Steven Thornton 6, Stephen C Robson 7, Alex McConnachie 3, Stavros Petrou 8, Neil J Sebire 2, Tina Lavender 9, Sonia Whyte 1, John Norrie 10,

1 Tommy’s Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Institute of Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
3 Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
4 Women’s Health Academic Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
5 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
6 Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Barts), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
7 The Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
8 Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
9 School of Nursing, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
10 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jane.norman@ed.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document