Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Quality improvement incorporating behaviour change techniques increased diabetic retinopathy screening attendance by 12% on average compared with usual care, with a high probability of being cost-effective at a societal willingness to pay threshold of £20,000/QALY.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

John G Lawrenson 1,*, Ella Graham-Rowe 2, Fabiana Lorencatto 2, Stephen Rice 3, Catey Bunce 4, Jill J Francis 2, Jennifer M Burr 5, Patricia Aluko 3, Luke Vale 3, Tunde Peto 6, Justin Presseau 7,8, Noah M Ivers 9, Jeremy M Grimshaw 7,10

1 Centre for Applied Vision Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
2 Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
3 Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Department of Primary Care & Public Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
5 School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
6 School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
7 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
8 School of Epidemiology, Public Health, and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
9 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women’s College Hospital – University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
10 Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
* Corresponding author Email: j.g.lawrenson@city.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions