Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Staff training in positive behaviour support did not reduce challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability, although both service users and carers reported some benefits from the training.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Angela Hassiotis, Michaela Poppe, Andre Strydom, Victoria Vickerstaff, Ian Hall, Jason Crabtree, Rumana Omar, Michael King, Rachael Hunter, Alessandro Bosco, Asit Biswas, Victoria Ratti, Jessica Blickwedel, Vivien Cooper, William Howie & Mike Crawford.

Angela Hassiotis 1,*, Michaela Poppe 1, Andre Strydom 1, Victoria Vickerstaff 1, Ian Hall 2, Jason Crabtree 2, Rumana Omar 3, Michael King 1, Rachael Hunter 4, Alessandro Bosco 5, Asit Biswas 6, Victoria Ratti 1, Jessica Blickwedel 7, Vivien Cooper 8, William Howie 9, Mike Crawford 10

1 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
2 Tower Hamlets Community Learning Disability Service, Mile End Hospital, London, UK
3 Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
4 University College London PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
5 Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
6 Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Directorate of Learning Disabilities, Frith Hospital, Leicester, UK
7 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
8 Challenging Behaviour Foundation, Chatham, UK
9 South West London and St George’s Mental Health Trust, Wandsworth Community Mental Health Learning Disabilities Team, Springfield University Hospital, London, UK
10 Centre for Mental Health, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions