Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate in labour did not improve outcomes in the neonatal period or at 2 years.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Peter Brocklehurst 1,*, David Field 2, Keith Greene 3, Edmund Juszczak 4, Sara Kenyon 5, Louise Linsell 4, Chris Mabey 6, Mary Newburn 7, Rachel Plachcinski 8, Maria Quigley 4, Philip Steer 9, Liz Schroeder 10, Oliver Rivero-Arias 4

1 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
3 University College London, London, UK
4 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit (NPEU CTU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
6 K2 Medical Systems, Plymouth, UK
7 Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London, King’s College London, London, UK
8 National Childbirth Trust, London, UK
9 Imperial College London, London, UK
10 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions