Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Routine use of cell salvage during caesarean section had an uncertain effect on reducing blood transfusion and is unlikely to be considered cost-effective.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Khalid S Khan, Philip Moore, Matthew Wilson, Richard Hooper, Shubha Allard, Ian Wrench, Tracy Roberts, Carol McLoughlin, Lee Beresford, James Geoghegan, Jane Daniels, Sue Catling, Vicki A Clark, Paul Ayuk, Stephen Robson, Fang Gao-Smith, Matthew Hogg, Louise Jackson, Doris Lanz & Julie Dodds.

Khalid S Khan 1,*, Philip Moore 2, Matthew Wilson 3, Richard Hooper 4, Shubha Allard 5, Ian Wrench 6, Tracy Roberts 7, Carol McLoughlin 7, Lee Beresford 4, James Geoghegan 2, Jane Daniels 8, Sue Catling 9, Vicki A Clark 10, Paul Ayuk 11, Stephen Robson 12, Fang Gao-Smith 13, Matthew Hogg 14, Louise Jackson 7, Doris Lanz 1, Julie Dodds 1

1 Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
2 Selwyn Crawford Department of Anaesthetics, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
3 School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4 Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
5 Haematology, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK
6 Anaesthetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
7 Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
8 Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
9 Department of Anaesthetics, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
10 Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
11 Women’s Services, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
12 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
13 Perioperative, Critical Care and Trauma Trials Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
14 Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions