Journals Library

Advanced

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

View Award

The Mam-Kind peer-support breastfeeding intervention was acceptable and feasible to deliver within NHS maternity services and this study made recommendations for further evaluation.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Shantini Paranjothy, Lauren Copeland, Laura Merrett, Aimee Grant, Rhiannon Phillips, Nina Gobat, Julia Sanders, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Billie Hunter, Sian Regan, Rebecca Playle, Amy Brown, Sally Tedstone, Heather Trickey & Mike Robling.

Shantini Paranjothy 1,*, Lauren Copeland 1, Laura Merrett 1, Aimee Grant 2, Rhiannon Phillips 1, Nina Gobat 1, Julia Sanders 3, Deborah Fitzsimmons 4, Billie Hunter 3, Sian Regan 5, Rebecca Playle 2, Amy Brown 6, Sally Tedstone 7, Heather Trickey 8, Mike Robling 2

1 Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
2 Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
3 School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
4 College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
5 Involving People Network, Cardiff, UK
6 Public Health, Policy and Social Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
7 Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
8 Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
* Corresponding author Email: ParanjothyS@cardiff.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

© NIHR 2024