Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Traditional haemorrhoidectomy was more clinically effective than stapled haemorrhoidopexy, although more painful in the short term.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Angus JM Watson 1,*, Jonathan Cook 2, Jemma Hudson 3, Mary Kilonzo 4, Jessica Wood 3,5, Hanne Bruhn 3, Steven Brown 6, Brian Buckley 7, Finlay Curran 8, David Jayne 9, Malcolm Loudon 10, Ramesh Rajagopal 11, Alison McDonald 3,5, John Norrie 3,5

1 NHS Highland, Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
2 Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
5 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
6 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
7 Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, the Philippines
8 Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
9 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
10 NHS Highland, Department of Surgery, Belford Hospital, Fort William, UK
11 Glan Clwyd Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, North Wales, UK
* Corresponding author Email: angus.watson@nhs.net

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions