Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Steve Goodacre 1,*, Judith Cohen 1, Mike Bradburn 1, John Stevens 1, Alasdair Gray 2, Jonathan Benger 3, Tim Coats 4,

1 School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3 Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
4 Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
* Corresponding author Email: s.goodacre@sheffield.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnesium sulphate, administered by the intravenous (i.v.) or inhaled (nebulised) route, has been proposed as a treatment for adults with acute severe asthma. Existing trials show mixed results and uncertain evidence of benefit.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether i.v. or nebulised magnesium sulphate improves symptoms of breathlessness and reduces the need for hospital admission in adults with acute severe asthma.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, randomised trial.

SETTING

The emergency departments of 34 acute hospitals in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited 1109 adults (age >16 years) with acute severe asthma [peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) <50% of best/predicted, respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute, heart rate >110 beats per minute or inability to complete sentences in one breath]. Patients with life-threatening features or a contraindication to either nebulised or intravenous magnesium sulphate were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly allocated to i.v. magnesium sulphate (2â g over 20 minutes) or nebulised magnesium sulphate (3 Ã 500 mg over 1 hour) or standard therapy alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to hospital (either after emergency department treatment or at any time over the subsequent 7 days) and breathlessness measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 2 hours after initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

We randomised 406 patients to i.v. magnesium sulphate, 339 to nebulised magnesium sulphate and 364 to placebo. Hospital admission was recorded for 394, 332 and 358 patients, respectively, and VAS breathlessness for 357, 296 and 323 patients respectively. Mean age was 36.1 years and 763 out of 1084 (70%) patients were female. Intravenous magnesium sulphate was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.04; p=0.083] for hospital admission, an improvement in VAS breathlessness that was 2.6 mm (95% CI -1.6 to 6.8 mm; p=0.231) greater than that associated with placebo and an improvement in PEFR that was 2.4 l/minute (95% CI -8.8 to 13.6 l/minute; p=0.680) greater than that associated with placebo. Nebulised magnesium sulphate was associated with an OR of 0.96 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.40; p=0.819) for hospital admission, an improvement in VAS breathlessness that was 2.6 mm (95% CI -1.8 mm to 7.0 mm; p=0.253) less than that associated with placebo and an improvement in PEFR that was 2.6 l/minute (95% CI -9.2 to 14.5 l/minute; p=0.644) less than that associated with placebo. There were no significant differences between i.v. or nebulised magnesium sulphate and placebo for any other outcomes. The number (%) of patients reporting any side effect was 61 (15.5%) in the i.v. group, 52 (15.7%) in the nebuliser group and 36 (10.1%) in the placebo group. The ORs for suffering any side effect were 1.68 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.63; p=0.025) for i.v. compared with placebo and 1.67 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.66; p=0.031) for nebuliser compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate a clinically worthwhile benefit from magnesium sulphate in acute severe asthma. There was some weak evidence of an effect of i.v. magnesium sulphate on hospital admission, but no evidence of an effect on VAS breathlessness or PEFR compared with placebo. We found no evidence that nebulised magnesium sulphate was more effective than placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04417063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnesium sulphate, administered by the intravenous (i.v.) or inhaled (nebulised) route, has been proposed as a treatment for adults with acute severe asthma. Existing trials show mixed results and uncertain evidence of benefit.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether i.v. or nebulised magnesium sulphate improves symptoms of breathlessness and reduces the need for hospital admission in adults with acute severe asthma.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, randomised trial.

SETTING

The emergency departments of 34 acute hospitals in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited 1109 adults (age >16 years) with acute severe asthma [peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) <50% of best/predicted, respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute, heart rate >110 beats per minute or inability to complete sentences in one breath]. Patients with life-threatening features or a contraindication to either nebulised or intravenous magnesium sulphate were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly allocated to i.v. magnesium sulphate (2â g over 20 minutes) or nebulised magnesium sulphate (3 Ã 500 mg over 1 hour) or standard therapy alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to hospital (either after emergency department treatment or at any time over the subsequent 7 days) and breathlessness measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 2 hours after initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

We randomised 406 patients to i.v. magnesium sulphate, 339 to nebulised magnesium sulphate and 364 to placebo. Hospital admission was recorded for 394, 332 and 358 patients, respectively, and VAS breathlessness for 357, 296 and 323 patients respectively. Mean age was 36.1 years and 763 out of 1084 (70%) patients were female. Intravenous magnesium sulphate was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.04; p=0.083] for hospital admission, an improvement in VAS breathlessness that was 2.6 mm (95% CI -1.6 to 6.8 mm; p=0.231) greater than that associated with placebo and an improvement in PEFR that was 2.4 l/minute (95% CI -8.8 to 13.6 l/minute; p=0.680) greater than that associated with placebo. Nebulised magnesium sulphate was associated with an OR of 0.96 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.40; p=0.819) for hospital admission, an improvement in VAS breathlessness that was 2.6 mm (95% CI -1.8 mm to 7.0 mm; p=0.253) less than that associated with placebo and an improvement in PEFR that was 2.6 l/minute (95% CI -9.2 to 14.5 l/minute; p=0.644) less than that associated with placebo. There were no significant differences between i.v. or nebulised magnesium sulphate and placebo for any other outcomes. The number (%) of patients reporting any side effect was 61 (15.5%) in the i.v. group, 52 (15.7%) in the nebuliser group and 36 (10.1%) in the placebo group. The ORs for suffering any side effect were 1.68 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.63; p=0.025) for i.v. compared with placebo and 1.67 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.66; p=0.031) for nebuliser compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate a clinically worthwhile benefit from magnesium sulphate in acute severe asthma. There was some weak evidence of an effect of i.v. magnesium sulphate on hospital admission, but no evidence of an effect on VAS breathlessness or PEFR compared with placebo. We found no evidence that nebulised magnesium sulphate was more effective than placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04417063.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions