Journals Library

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Study found insufficient published evidence to establish whether or not head cooling in patients with traumatic brain injury or stroke improves functional outcome or has benefits and fewer side effects compared with systemic cooling or no cooling.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brain injuries resulting from trauma and stroke are common and costly. Cooling therapy may reduce damage and potentially improve outcome. Head cooling targets the site of injury and may have fewer side effects than systemic cooling, but there has been no systematic review and the evidence base is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of non-invasive head cooling after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke on intracranial and/or core body temperature, functional outcome and mortality, determine adverse effects and evaluate cost-effectiveness.

REVIEW METHODS

Search strategyâ Major international databases [including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, the British Library's Electronic Table of Contents (Zetoc)], The Cochrane Library, trial registers, country-specific databases (including China, Japan), Google Scholar, hypothermia conference reports and reference lists of papers were searched with no publication or language restrictions. The searches were conducted from March 2010 to April 2011, with no back date restriction. Selection criteriaâ For formal analysis of effect of head cooling on functional outcome and mortality: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-invasive head cooling in TBI or stroke in adults (aged â ¥ 18 years). RCT prespecified in protocol to include adequate randomisation and blinded outcome assessment. For assessment of effect on temperature and adverse effects of cooling methods/devices: studies of any type in TBI, stroke, cardiac arrest and neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (adverse effects only). Data collection and analysisâ A study assessment and data collection form was developed and piloted. Data on functional outcome, mortality, temperature change and adverse effects of devices were sought and extracted. Two authors independently assessed RCTs for quality using the Cochrane Renal Group checklist.

RESULTS

Out of 46 head-cooling studies in TBI and stroke, there were no RCTs of suitable quality for formal outcome analysis. Twelve studies had useable data on intracranial and core body temperature. These included 99 patients who were cooled after TBI or stroke and 198 patients cooled after cardiac arrest. The data were too heterogeneous for a single summary measure of effect (many studies had no measure of spread) and are therefore presented descriptively. The most effective techniques for which there were adequate data (nasal coolant and liquid cooling helmets) could reduce intracranial temperature by ⠥ 1 °C in 1 hour. The main device-related adverse effects were localised skin problems, which were generally mild and self-limiting. There were no suitable data for economic modelling, but an exploratory model of possible treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of head cooling in TBI was created using local patient data.

LIMITATIONS

We conducted extensive and sensitive searches but found no good-quality RCTs of the effect of head cooling on functional outcome that met the review inclusion criteria. Most trials were small and/or of low methodological quality. However, if the trial reports did not reflect the true quality of the research, there may be some excluded trials that should have been included. Temperature data were often poorly reported which made it difficult to assess the effect of head cooling on temperature.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether head cooling improves functional outcome or has benefits and fewer side effects compared with systemic cooling or no cooling could not be established. Some methods of head cooling can reduce intracranial temperature, which is an important first step in determining effectiveness, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend its use outside of research trials. The principal recommendations for research are that active cooling devices show the most promise for further investigation and more robust proof of concept of intracranial and core body temperature reduction with head cooling is required, clearly showing whether temperature has changed and by how much.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brain injuries resulting from trauma and stroke are common and costly. Cooling therapy may reduce damage and potentially improve outcome. Head cooling targets the site of injury and may have fewer side effects than systemic cooling, but there has been no systematic review and the evidence base is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of non-invasive head cooling after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke on intracranial and/or core body temperature, functional outcome and mortality, determine adverse effects and evaluate cost-effectiveness.

REVIEW METHODS

Search strategyâ Major international databases [including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, the British Library's Electronic Table of Contents (Zetoc)], The Cochrane Library, trial registers, country-specific databases (including China, Japan), Google Scholar, hypothermia conference reports and reference lists of papers were searched with no publication or language restrictions. The searches were conducted from March 2010 to April 2011, with no back date restriction. Selection criteriaâ For formal analysis of effect of head cooling on functional outcome and mortality: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-invasive head cooling in TBI or stroke in adults (aged â ¥ 18 years). RCT prespecified in protocol to include adequate randomisation and blinded outcome assessment. For assessment of effect on temperature and adverse effects of cooling methods/devices: studies of any type in TBI, stroke, cardiac arrest and neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (adverse effects only). Data collection and analysisâ A study assessment and data collection form was developed and piloted. Data on functional outcome, mortality, temperature change and adverse effects of devices were sought and extracted. Two authors independently assessed RCTs for quality using the Cochrane Renal Group checklist.

RESULTS

Out of 46 head-cooling studies in TBI and stroke, there were no RCTs of suitable quality for formal outcome analysis. Twelve studies had useable data on intracranial and core body temperature. These included 99 patients who were cooled after TBI or stroke and 198 patients cooled after cardiac arrest. The data were too heterogeneous for a single summary measure of effect (many studies had no measure of spread) and are therefore presented descriptively. The most effective techniques for which there were adequate data (nasal coolant and liquid cooling helmets) could reduce intracranial temperature by ⠥ 1 °C in 1 hour. The main device-related adverse effects were localised skin problems, which were generally mild and self-limiting. There were no suitable data for economic modelling, but an exploratory model of possible treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of head cooling in TBI was created using local patient data.

LIMITATIONS

We conducted extensive and sensitive searches but found no good-quality RCTs of the effect of head cooling on functional outcome that met the review inclusion criteria. Most trials were small and/or of low methodological quality. However, if the trial reports did not reflect the true quality of the research, there may be some excluded trials that should have been included. Temperature data were often poorly reported which made it difficult to assess the effect of head cooling on temperature.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether head cooling improves functional outcome or has benefits and fewer side effects compared with systemic cooling or no cooling could not be established. Some methods of head cooling can reduce intracranial temperature, which is an important first step in determining effectiveness, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend its use outside of research trials. The principal recommendations for research are that active cooling devices show the most promise for further investigation and more robust proof of concept of intracranial and core body temperature reduction with head cooling is required, clearly showing whether temperature has changed and by how much.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

 

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below.

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions