An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Page not found (404)
Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.
Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Toolkit
The assessment finds that radiation dose is considerably lower with EOS X-ray imaging than standard X-ray, but the long-term health benefits from the reduced radiation exposure were very small. There was no data on other potential patient health benefits arising from the nature or quality of the EOS image. Estimates of patient throughput at national level suggested that EOS would not be cost-effective, given the high cost of the EOS system.
1 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
2 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
3 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: ros.wade@york.ac.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
Report Content
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
Responses to this report
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document