Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Study found no convincing evidence to support recommendations for routine self-monitoring of blood glucose for non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

AJ Farmer, AN Wade, DP French, J Simon, P Yudkin, A Gray, A Craven, L Goyder, RR Holman, D Mant, A-L Kinmonth & HAW Neil.

AJ Farmer 1,*, AN Wade 2, DP French 3, J Simon 4, P Yudkin 1, A Gray 4, A Craven 1, L Goyder 5, RR Holman 6, D Mant 1, A-L Kinmonth 7, HAW Neil 8

1 Department of Primary Health Care, NIHR School of Primary Care Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
3 Applied Research Centre in Health and Lifestyle Interventions, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
4 Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
6 Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
8 Division of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
* Corresponding author Email: andrew.farmer@dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document