Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Adoption of evidence-based core components was associated with a more responsive and intensive intervention, facilitated by interdisciplinary team working and effective cross-pathway communication, but did not affect the patient outcome measure.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rebecca J Fisher 1,*, Niki Chouliara 1, Adrian Byrne 1, Trudi Cameron 1, Sarah Lewis 2, Peter Langhorne 3, Thompson Robinson 4, Justin Waring 5, Claudia Geue 6, Lizz Paley 7, Anthony Rudd 7, Marion F Walker 1

1 Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2 Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
3 Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
4 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
5 Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
6 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
7 Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, King’s College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: rebecca.fisher@nottingham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions