Journals Library

Advanced

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

View Award

This study found that acute day units, although not routinely provided in the NHS, were highly valued by staff and service users, with some evidence of better outcomes.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

David Osborn 1,*, Danielle Lamb 1, Alastair Canaway 2, Michael Davidson 1, Graziella Favarato 1, Vanessa Pinfold 3, Terry Harper 3, Sonia Johnson 1, Hameed Khan 3, James Kirkbride 1, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans 1, Jason Madan 2, Farhana Mann 1, Louise Marston 1, Adele McKay 4, Nicola Morant 1, Debra Smith 3, Thomas Steare 1, Jane Wackett 3, Scott Weich 5

1 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
2 Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
3 McPin Foundation, London, UK
4 Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
5 Mental Health Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
* Corresponding author Email: d.osborn@ucl.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Sonia Johnson reports the following grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR): the Mental Health Research Policy Unit, various Programme Grants for Applied Research programme grants (1210-12002, 0514-20004, 0615-20021, 0612-20004, 0612-20002), various Health Technology Assessment programme grants (09/114/50, 14/49/34) and various Health Services and Delivery Research programme grants (14/04/16, 17/49/70) outside the submitted work. Scott Weich reports membership of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Clinical Trials and Evaluation Panel (November 2016–October 2019) with travel and subsistence expenses, and membership of the HTA Prioritisation Strategy Group (2009–16) outside the submitted work. Scott Weich also reports other NIHR research grant awards.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

© NIHR 2024