Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study developed a realist programme theory explaining how physical activity could be promoted in primary care in people with long-term conditions, which informed the co-design of a prototype intervention.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rebecca-Jane Law, Joseph Langley, Beth Hall, Christopher Burton, Julia Hiscock, Lynne Williams, Val Morrison, Andrew B Lemmey, Candida Lovell-Smith, John Gallanders, Jennifer Cooney & Nefyn H Williams.

Rebecca-Jane Law 1,*, Joseph Langley 2, Beth Hall 3, Christopher Burton 4, Julia Hiscock 1, Lynne Williams 1, Val Morrison 5, Andrew B Lemmey 6, Candida Lovell-Smith 7, John Gallanders 7, Jennifer Cooney 6, Nefyn H Williams 8

1 School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
2 Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
3 Library and Archives Services, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
4 School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
5 School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
6 School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
7 PPI research partner, ,
8 Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
* Corresponding author Email: r.law@bangor.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions