Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found that few young people who need ongoing support for their ADHD successfully transfer to adult services, few experience optimal transitional care, and adult ADHD service provision is patchy.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Astrid Janssens 1,2, Helen Eke 1, Anna Price 1, Tamsin Newlove-Delgado 1, Sharon Blake 1, Cornelius Ani 3,4, Philip Asherson 5,6, Bryony Beresford 7, Tobit Emmens 8, Chris Hollis 9,10,11, Stuart Logan 1,12,13, Moli Paul 14,15, Kapil Sayal 9,10, Susan Young 16, Tamsin Ford 1,17,*

1 Child Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2 User Perspectives, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
3 Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, UK
5 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
6 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
7 Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK
8 Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
9 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
10 Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
11 National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Mental Health Theme, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
12 Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
13 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
14 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
15 Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
16 Psychology Services Limited, London, UK
17 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions