Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Digital methods can produce some improvements in the collection and usefulness of patient feedback, although they need to be complemented with alternative methods.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Caroline Sanders 1,*, Papreen Nahar 1, Nicola Small 1, Damian Hodgson 2, Bie Nio Ong 1, Azad Dehghan 3, Charlotte A Sharp 1, William G Dixon 4, Shôn Lewis 5, Evangelos Kontopantelis 1, Gavin Daker-White 1, Peter Bower 1, Linda Davies 6, Humayun Kayesh 3, Rebecca Spencer 7, Aneela McAvoy 1,7, Ruth Boaden 2,7, Karina Lovell 1,8, John Ainsworth 9, Magdalena Nowakowska 1, Andrew Shepherd 1, Patrick Cahoon 10, Richard Hopkins 10, Dawn Allen 11, Annmarie Lewis 11, Goran Nenadic 3

1 National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
4 Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Greater Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
8 Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
10 Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
11 Patient and public representative, ,
* Corresponding author Email: caroline.sanders@manchester.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions