Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This nurse-led preventive intervention did not reduce post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity at 6 months in critically ill patients in intensive care units.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul R Mouncey, Dorothy Wade, Alvin Richards-Belle, Zia Sadique, Jerome Wulff, Richard Grieve, Lydia M Emerson, Chris R Brewin, Sheila Harvey, David Howell, Nicholas Hudson, Imran Khan, Monty Mythen, Deborah Smyth, John Weinman, John Welch, David A Harrison & Kathryn M Rowan.

Paul R Mouncey 1,, Dorothy Wade 2,, Alvin Richards-Belle 1, Zia Sadique 3, Jerome Wulff 1, Richard Grieve 3, Lydia M Emerson 4, Chris R Brewin 5, Sheila Harvey 1, David Howell 2, Nicholas Hudson 1, Imran Khan 1, Monty Mythen 6, Deborah Smyth 2, John Weinman 7, John Welch 2, David A Harrison 1, Kathryn M Rowan 1,*

1 Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK
2 Critical Care Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
4 Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
5 Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
6 National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, London, UK
7 Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions