Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The Salford Integrated Care Programme had more rapid success in establishing new integrated structures than in delivering integrated mechanisms or in having a large impact on patient outcomes.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Peter Bower 1,*, David Reeves 1, Matt Sutton 2, Karina Lovell 3, Amy Blakemore 3, Mark Hann 1, Kelly Howells 1, Rachel Meacock 2, Luke Munford 2, Maria Panagioti 1, Beth Parkinson 2, Lisa Riste 1, Mark Sidaway 4, Yiu-Shing Lau 2, Lynsey Warwick-Giles 5, John Ainsworth 6, Thomas Blakeman 1, Ruth Boaden 7, Iain Buchan 6, Stephen Campbell 8, Peter Coventry 9, Siobhan Reilly 10, Caroline Sanders 1, Suzanne Skevington 11, Waquas Waheed 1, Katherine Checkland 5

1 National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
4 Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
5 Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, Alliance Business School Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
8 National Institute for Health Research Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
10 Health Research, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
11 Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
* Corresponding author Email: peter.bower@manchester.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions