Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The programme changed ward practices and patient experience but there was no evidence that it improved clinical outcomes; although it worked on two wards, organisational upheaval contributed to non-adoption in most wards.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Mary Godfrey 1,*, John Young 1,2, Rosemary Shannon 2, Ann Skingley 3,4, Rosemary Woolley 2, Frank Arrojo 5, Dawn Brooker 6, Kim Manley 4,7, Claire Surr 8

1 Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
2 Bradford Institute for Health Research (BIHR), Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
3 Sidney de Haan Research Centre for Arts and Health, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
4 East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
5 Patient and public involvement representative, Alzheimer’s Society Research Network, ,
6 Association for Dementia Studies, Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
7 England Centre for Practice Development, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
8 School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: m.godfrey@leeds.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions