Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Current quality indicators for community nursing are of limited use and lack of nurse and service user involvement in indicator selection processes impacted negatively on their application.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sue Horrocks 1,*, Katherine Pollard 1, Lorna Duncan 2, Christina Petsoulas 3, Emma Gibbard 4, Jane Cook 5, Ruth McDonald 6, Lesley Wye 2, Pauline Allen 3, Pete Husband 7, Lizanne Harland 8, Ailsa Cameron 2, Chris Salisbury 2

1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
2 Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
4 Research Impact Manager, University of Bath, Bath, UK
5 South West Clinical Research Network, Bristol, UK
6 Centre for Primary Care and the Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 Service user, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
8 NHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, Gloucester, UK
* Corresponding author Email: susan.horrocks@uwe.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions