Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.



Accelerated version of experience-based co-design (AEBCD) proved acceptable to staff and patients at around half the cost of the standard intervention. The use of national rather than local patient narrative films did not adversely affect staff or patient engagement, and acted as a successful ‘trigger’ to discussion. AEBCD resulted in some intensive work periods for facilitators but also led to staff development and capacity-building. AEBCD offers a rigorous and effective approach to patient-centred quality improvement.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Louise Locock,1,* Glenn Robert,2 Annette Boaz,3 Sonia Vougioukalou,4 Caroline Shuldham,5 Jonathan Fielden,6 Sue Ziebland,1 Melanie Gager,7 Ruth Tollyfield,8 John Pearcey,9 

1 Health Experiences Research Group, Primary Care Health Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 National Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
3 Centre for Health and Social Care Research, St George’s, University of London and Kingston University, London, UK
4 Centre for Public Engagement, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
6 University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
7 Intensive Care Unit, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
8 Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
9 Cancer and Thoracic Surgery Services, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author ; Email:

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue:{{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

An error has occurred in processing the XML document


Responses to this report


No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below.

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions