Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study designed the Qualdash dashboard and its evaluation potentially identified beneficial strategies for audits seeking to widen engagement, design of dashboards and organisations introducing a dashboard.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Rebecca Randell 1,2,*, Natasha Alvarado 1,2, Mai Elshehaly 2,3, Lynn McVey 1,2, Robert M West 4, Patrick Doherty 5, Dawn Dowding 6, Amanda J Farrin 7, Richard G Feltbower 8, Chris P Gale 8, Joanne Greenhalgh 9, Julia Lake 10, Mamas Mamas 11, Rebecca Walwyn 7, Roy A Ruddle 12

1 Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
2 Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
3 Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
4 Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
5 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
6 School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
8 Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
9 School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
10 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
11 Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
12 School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
* Corresponding author Email: r.randell@bradford.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions