Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Track-and-trigger tools do not improve detection of deterioration on their own, but assessing impacts of system-wide change was difficult due to low event rates for hard clinical outcomes.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Davina Allen 1,*, Amy Lloyd 2, Dawn Edwards 3, Aimee Grant 2, Kerenza Hood 2, Chao Huang 4, Jacqueline Hughes 2, Nina Jacob 2, David Lacy 5, Yvonne Moriarty 2, Alison Oliver 6, Jennifer Preston 7, Gerri Sefton 8, Richard Skone 6, Heather Strange 2, Khadijeh Taiyari 2, Emma Thomas-Jones 2, Robert Trubey 2, Lyvonne Tume 9, Colin Powell 10,11, Damian Roland 12

1 School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
2 Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
3 Children’s Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
4 Hull–York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
5 Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
6 Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
7 Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
8 Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
9 School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
10 Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
11 Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
12 Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Emergency Department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
* Corresponding author Email: allenda@cardiff.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions