Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Sepsis and ARDS subphenotypes based on clinical, cytokines, organ injury markers and variations in risk of death at baseline were observed, with differences in treatment effect in the ARDS trial.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Manu Shankar-Hari 1,2,*, Shalini Santhakumaran 3, A Toby Prevost 3, Josie K Ward 4, Timothy Marshall 4, Claire Bradley 4, Carolyn S Calfee 5,6,7, Kevin L Delucchi 8, Pratik Sinha 5, Michael A Matthay 5, Jonathan Hackett 9, Cliona McDowell 10, John G Laffey 11, Anthony Gordon 4, Cecilia M O’Kane 12, Daniel F McAuley 9,10,12

1 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
3 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College/Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
5 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
6 Department of Anaesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
7 Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
8 Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
9 Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
10 Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
11 Anaesthesia, School of Medicine and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
12 Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
* Corresponding author Email: manu.shankar-hari@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions