Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Co-careldopa in addition to routine occupational and physical therapy did not improve walking, physical functioning, mood or cognition following stroke.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Gary A Ford, Bipin B Bhakta, Alastair Cozens, Bonnie Cundill, Suzanne Hartley, Ivana Holloway, David Meads, John Pearn, Sharon Ruddock, Catherine M Sackley, Eirini-Christina Saloniki, Gillian Santorelli, Marion F Walker & Amanda J Farrin.

Gary A Ford 1,*, Bipin B Bhakta 2,, Alastair Cozens 3, Bonnie Cundill 4, Suzanne Hartley 4, Ivana Holloway 4, David Meads 5, John Pearn 2, Sharon Ruddock 4, Catherine M Sackley 6, Eirini-Christina Saloniki 5, Gillian Santorelli 4, Marion F Walker 7, Amanda J Farrin 4

1 Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
4 Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
5 Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
6 Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Rehabilitation and Ageing, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email: gary.ford@ouh.nhs.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions