Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Neither eicosapentaenoic acid nor aspirin reduced the proportion of individuals with any colorectal adenoma recurrence during surveillance in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Mark A Hull 1,*, Kirsty Sprange 2, Trish Hepburn 2, Wei Tan 2, Aisha Shafayat 2, Colin J Rees 3, Gayle Clifford 4, Richard F Logan 5, Paul M Loadman 6, Elizabeth A Williams 7, Diane Whitham 2, Alan A Montgomery 2

1 Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
2 Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Queen’s Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
3 Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 South Tyneside District Hospital, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
5 Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
6 School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
7 Department of Oncology & Metabolism, Human Nutrition Unit, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
* Corresponding author Email: M.A.Hull@leeds.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions