Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Functional strength training was no better than movement performance therapy in improving upper limb motor recovery as measured in the Action Research Arm Test.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Valerie M Pomeroy 1,*, Susan M Hunter 2, Heidi Johansen-Berg 3, Nick S Ward 4, Niamh Kennedy 1,5, Elizabeth Chandler 1, Christopher J Weir 6, John Rothwell 7, Alan Wing 8, Michael Grey 1, Garry Barton 9, Nick Leavey 10

1 Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Alliance, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
2 Institute for Applied Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation, Keele University, Keele, UK
3 Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
4 Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
5 School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
6 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
7 Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
8 School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
9 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
10 Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
* Corresponding author Email: v.pomeroy@uea.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions