Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Intracoronary adenosine or sodium nitroprusside during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction did not reduce infarct size and there was evidence of mid-term harm with adenosine.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sheraz A Nazir 1, Jamal N Khan 1, Islam Z Mahmoud 2, John P Greenwood 3, Daniel J Blackman 3, Vijay Kunadian 4, Martin Been 5, Keith R Abrams 6, Robert Wilcox 7, AA Jennifer Adgey 8, Gerry P McCann 1, Anthony H Gershlick 1,*

1 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
2 Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Rayne Institute, BHF Excellence Centre, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
3 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
4 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University and Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
6 Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
7 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
8 Heart Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
* Corresponding author Email: agershlick@aol.com

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions