Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not improve clinical outcomes in higher-risk adults undergoing on-pump CABG surgery.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Derek J Hausenloy, Luciano Candilio, Richard Evans, Cono Ariti, David P Jenkins, Shyamsunder Kolvekar, Rosemary Knight, Gudrun Kunst, Christopher Laing, Jennifer M Nicholas, John Pepper, Steven Robertson, Maria Xenou, Timothy Clayton & Derek M Yellon.

Derek J Hausenloy 1,2,3,4,*,, Luciano Candilio 1,, Richard Evans 5, Cono Ariti 5, David P Jenkins 6, Shyamsunder Kolvekar 7, Rosemary Knight 5, Gudrun Kunst 8, Christopher Laing 9, Jennifer M Nicholas 5, John Pepper 10, Steven Robertson 5, Maria Xenou 1, Timothy Clayton 5, Derek M Yellon 1,2

1 Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
3 National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
4 Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke–National University of Singapore, Singapore
5 Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
6 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
7 The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8 Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Therapy, King’s College London and King’s College Hospital, London, UK
9 University College London Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
10 National Institute for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: derek.hausenloy@duke-nus.edu.sg Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions