Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Daily injections of anakinra did not show change in disease activity compared with placebo when assessed by the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index at 8 weeks.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Suzie Cro 1, Victoria Cornelius 1, Francesca Capon 2, Jonathan Barker 3, David Burden 4, Christopher Griffiths 5,6, Helen Jane Lachmann 7, Helen McAteer 8, Prakash Patel 9, Andrew Pink 9, Nick Reynolds 10,11,12, Richard Warren 5,6,13, Catherine Smith 9,*

1 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King’s College London, London, UK
3 St John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
4 Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
5 Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
7 The National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, London, UK
8 The Psoriasis Association, Northampton, UK
9 St John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
10 Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
11 Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
12 National Institute for Health Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
13 Manchester National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
* Corresponding author Email: catherine.smith@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions